September 29, 2025

7 thoughts on “How Linkedin’s hiring assistant impact recruitment

  1. I’m grateful to see this article shedding light on the impact of LinkedIn’s Hiring Assistant on the recruitment industry. As I pondered the implications, I couldn’t help but think about how automation is also playing a role in the recent tragic events involving Brian Thompson’s shooting.

    It’s astonishing to consider how AI-powered tools can both streamline processes and create new opportunities for innovation. Yet, as we move forward, it’s crucial that we acknowledge the potential consequences of relying too heavily on automation.

    I’d love to hear from others: In a world where AI tools are increasingly prevalent, what role do you envision for human recruiters in the future? Will they become obsolete, or will they adapt and find new ways to add value to the hiring process?

    And on a related note, how can freelance recruiters and independent staffing agency owners ensure that their services remain relevant in an era of automation? Are there any specific strategies or partnerships that you think would be effective in this context?

    1. Carter, I must respectfully challenge your assertion that human recruiters can simply focus on high-value services to complement AI tools without a fundamental shift in understanding what it means to be human. As someone who has dedicated their career to recruitment and staff management, I’ve seen firsthand how automation can lead to dehumanization of the hiring process. Don’t you think, Carter, that your emphasis on adapting to AI-driven change overlooks the very real risk of losing the emotional intelligence and empathy that is the lifeblood of effective recruitment? How can we truly value human connection in a world where machines are increasingly making decisions?

      Also, I’d like to address Peyton’s criticism of your tendency to name-drop. While I appreciate the reference to Beckett’s work, I believe it detracts from the substance of our discussion rather than adding nuance to it.

      Finally, Maria, I agree that Carter’s words do raise an important question about what it means to be human in a world where machines can do many jobs, but shouldn’t we also examine the potential consequences of relying too heavily on AI tools?

  2. I’m electrified by the prospect of LinkedIn’s Hiring Assistant disrupting the recruitment industry, but I have to challenge the notion that these AI tools are necessarily here to replace human recruiters. As someone who’s worked extensively with freelance recruiters in niche industries, I can attest that their expertise and emotional intelligence are invaluable assets that can’t be replicated by machines alone – at least, not yet! What if we’re on the cusp of a new era where humans and AI systems collaborate to create truly innovative recruitment solutions? By embracing this synergy, we might just unlock a future where freelance recruiters and independent staffing agency owners thrive, rather than becoming obsolete. Can we envision a world where AI tools augment human recruiters’ skills, enabling them to focus on high-value services like strategic advising and talent development?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *